Home > Cannot Resolve > Cannot Resolve Kdc For Requested Realm Netapp Cifs

Cannot Resolve Kdc For Requested Realm Netapp Cifs

Also in my DCs the reg value "enablesecuritysignature" and "requiresecuritysignature" values are "1" , mean enabled....so could this be stopping NetApp to get authenticated with DC? Thanks! Subscribe to our monthly newsletter for tech news and trends Membership How it Works Gigs Live Careers Plans and Pricing For Business Become an Expert Resource Center About Us Who We This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. check over here

Login. Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest I had to stop and restart CIFS to get CIFS working properly. NetApp did release a fix in 6.5.6 (or maybe a slightly earlier P release) that made the DC test a little smarter. dig this

I will try and track down our original case number if it helps. I have a case open with Netapp as well. -Mark ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. Is the time correct? 0 Message Accepted Solution by:melfarit2014-02-16 melfarit earned 0 total points Comment Utility Permalink(# a39862434) Hi, The problem was an old domain configuration. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  1. Peter From: [hidden email] [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Aaron Lewis Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:29 AM To: Parisi, Justin; [hidden email] Subject: Re: cDOT CIFS setup Thanks.
  2. MCTS|MCSE|MCSA:Messaging|CCNA Marked as answer by himanshu.rana Thursday, January 03, 2013 4:44 AM Edited by himanshu.rana Thursday, January 03, 2013 4:45 AM Thursday, January 03, 2013 4:44 AM Reply | Quote All
  3. does the issue persist?
  4. i.e.
  5. LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Networking Cannot resolve network address for KDC in requested realm while getting initial crede User Name Remember Me?
  6. It was clients attempting new connections that were met with the"Access is denied" message.

Did you run DCDIAG with /v/c/d/e switches, coz normal dcdiag doesn't perform health analysis. Peter From: toasters-bounces [at] teaparty [mailto:toasters-bounces [at] teaparty] On Behalf Of Aaron Lewis Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 10:29 AM To: Parisi, Justin; toasters [at] teaparty Subject: Re: cDOT CIFS setup If the DCDIAG tests passed successfully,then this could be connectivity issue. Reply 0 Kudos « Message Listing « Previous Topic Next Topic » MORE IN COMMUNITY Learn How to Get Started Community Help Community Code of Conduct Provide Community Feedback Forums Blogs

NetApp did release a fix in 6.5.6 (or maybe a slightly earlier P release) that made the DC test a little smarter. Also the /e in dcdiag scans the complete forest, so better run it on COB. Enter the user name: XXXXXX Enter the password: Error: CIFS server creation procedure failed [ 27] Loaded the preliminary configuration. [ 62] Created a machine account for the Cifs server in Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.

Use both IP addresses and DNS names.That would eliminate the easier problems. The filer is running 8.2P3. Are your DC's experiencing any issues? Workstation name is not always available and may be left blank in some cases.

Derek From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]: Thursday, January 26, 2006 2:13 PMTo: [email protected]: CIFS PDC Issues Today I had several filers at different OS levels stop serving data via http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/netapp/toasters/13439 At a guess I would say you are using multi VIF's, or are you using LACP. Thu Jul 19 05:54:43 JST [FILER002: auth.ldap.trace.LDAPConnection.statusMsg:info]: AUTH: TraceLDAPServer- Found 17 AD LDAP server addresses using generic DNS query. It seemed that if 1 DC "authentication pipe" shutdown with the filer, the filer was not smart enough to move onto the next one in the list.

is there any error? check my blog Check above article in Meinolf's post and ensure the AD required ports are open on firewall. For connectivity assure that AD required ports are open according to http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd772723(WS.10).aspxBest regards Meinolf Weber MVP, MCP, MCTS Microsoft MVP - Directory Services My Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/mweber/ Disclaimer: This posting is provided Plan accordingly based on the type of workload you have!

Reason: typo Andersonian View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by Andersonian 11-15-2013, 10:45 AM #6 Pithor LQ Newbie Registered: Thu Jul 19 05:53:47 JST [FILER002: cifs.server.infoMsg:info]: CIFS: Warning for server \\BJSDC01: Connection terminated. Do you know if ALL sessions were affected, existing AND new? this content Thu Jul 19 05:53:47 JST [FILER002: cifs.server.errorMsg:error]: CIFS: Error for server \\BJSDC02: CIFS Tree Connect Error STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.

netapp::vserver cifs> create -cifs-server "testcifs" -domain " XXXXXX.local" In order to create an Active Directory machine account for the CIFS server, you must supply the name and password of a Thu Jul 19 05:53:44 JST [FILER002: auth.dc.trace.DCConnection.statusMsg:info]: AUTH: TraceDC- DC address discovery for ABC complete. 16 unique addresses found. Also domain members should sync with DC.

Something they call DCPING as part of the Filer AD site awareness.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012 5:57 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Hello, to assure the domain and DCs are healthy use the support tools and check the output There is no need to add the domain name portion, 'DC=ABC,DC=com', of the distinguished name. i.e. there is no firewall betw Filers and DCs.

The issue was intermittent and could affect 1 filer in a cluster even though they had the same settings. That said, use the imbedded technologies in ONTAP to protect you as much as possible (MPIO, RAID-DP, CFO). Has anyone seen this before? have a peek at these guys WAN accelerators was havingsignature embedded was interfering during caching Also share the command for the same.

You might have a DNS problem. Friday, August 31, 2012 8:21 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote hi, USER is domain admins member, and there is no problem with this user, because after a Could be a simple typo when typing in the username/password.  It is unlikely to be this easy but it could be. 2. Please check these and update us on the details.